Journal of Sedimentary Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Sedimentary Research; November 2009; v. 79; no. 11; p. 808-816; DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2009.087
© 2009 SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frey, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dashtgard, S. E.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Research Articles: Sedimentary Structures

Experimental Studies of Gas-Escape and Water-Escape Structures: Mechanisms and Morphologies

Shannon E. Frey1, Murray K. Gingras2 and Shahin E. Dashtgard3

1 Department of Earth Sciences, 8888 University Drive, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
2 Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, 1-26 Earth Sciences Bldg, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada
3 Department of Earth Sciences, 8888 University Drive, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada

Water-escape and gas-escape structures were generated in the laboratory to assess variations in deformational structures generated during these events. Particulate fluidization was observed to be the method by which grains were redistributed during water escape. Resulting structures of particulate fluidization comprised disrupted and downward-deflected primary laminations, and a massive-appearing column of sand above the point source. Gas experiments, with a low flow rate (6.167 x 10–6 m3/s) allowed gas to disperse through fractures, and only subtle deformation was achieved. Aggregative fluidization (i.e., fluid movement through sediment as bubbles) was the mechanism for grain displacement during gas escape. With increased flow rate (7.67 x 10–5 m3/s) aggregative fluidization occurred and particles were carried upward in the wake of the passing gas bubble. Aggregative fluidization resulted in broken, upwards-warping laminations and convoluted bedding. Experiments illustrate a significant morphological difference between water escape and gas escape. Water-escape structures were bounded by downwards-warping laminations, consistent with water-escape structures encountered in the rock record. Gas-escape structures displayed upwards-warping laminations, and could represent a formation mechanism for convolute bedding.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology.