Journal of Sedimentary Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Sedimentary Research; August 2008; v. 78; no. 8; p. 529-547; DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2008.062
© 2008 SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sumner, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Talling, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Research Articles: Turbidites

Deposit Structure and Processes of Sand Deposition from Decelerating Sediment Suspensions

Esther J. Sumner1, Lawrence A. Amy2 and Peter J. Talling3

1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Queen’s Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, U.K.; esther.sumner{at}bris.ac.uk
2 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Queen’s Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, U.K.; present address: Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton Campus, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, U.K.
3 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Queen’s Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, U.K.

Turbidity currents are notoriously difficult to monitor directly, therefore interpretation of their deposits forms the basis for much of our understanding of these flows. The deceleration rate of a flow is a potentially important yet poorly understood control on depositional processes. A series of experiments were conducted in an annular flume, in which fast (up to 3.5 m/s) and highly turbulent flows of sand (up to 250 µm) and water were decelerated at different rates and processes of deposition and deposit character analyzed. Previously poorly documented depositional processes were observed in the experiments. This is because the flows were initially unusually fast and of prolonged duration, with sustained periods of sediment fallout as the flow slowed down. The conditions in these flows are thus likely to be closer to those at the base of a waning turbidity current than is achieved in other relatively slow experimental flows. The collapse of high-concentration, moving, thin (< 5 mm) near-bed layers (laminar sheared layers) were an important mechanism by which the bed aggraded beneath these unsteady flows. At bed aggradation rates in excess of 0.44 mm/s the sequential collapse of laminar sheared layers produced a structureless, poorly graded and poorly sorted deposit (Bouma Ta). When bed aggradation rates fell below 0.44 mm/s the collapsing laminar sheared layers were reworked by turbulence to form planar laminae (Bouma Tb). These laminae are formed in a very different manner than the planar laminae attributed to bedwaves in previous open-channel flow experiments. Collapse of laminar sheared layers is therefore an alternative process for generating the Bouma Tb division. Inverse grading developed at the base of the deposits of slowly decelerated flows. This inverse grading was probably a result of grain sorting in a high-concentration layer that persisted at the base of the flow for many minutes prior to the onset of deposition.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
E. J. Sumner, P. J. Talling, and L. A. Amy
Deposits of flows transitional between turbidity current and debris flow
Geology, November 1, 2009; 37(11): 991 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology.