Journal of Sedimentary Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Sedimentary Research; July 2006; v. 76; no. 7; p. 962-977; DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2006.084
© 2006 SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Research Articles: Carbonate Sedimentology

The Signal and the Noise: Forward Modeling of Allocyclic and Autocyclic Processes Influencing Peritidal Carbonate Stacking Patterns

Peter M. Burgess1

1 Shell International Exploration and Production B. V., Kessler Park 1, Postbus 60, 2280 AB Rijswijk, The Netherlands; Peter.Burgess{at}shell.com

Recent carbonate sequence stratigraphic models suggest that the degree of order present in successions of carbonate parasequences is determined by temporal variations in eustatic amplitude and by varying levels of autocyclicity. Ordered parasequence stacking is suggested to occur during greenhouse periods dominated by low-amplitude eustatic oscillations. Conversely, disordered vertical successions are said to occur when amplitudes of eustatic oscillations are high, or when autocyclic processes dominate and thus drown the periodic external signal. These assertions of causal mechanism are tested here by application of a three-dimensional stratigraphic forward model. The three-dimensional model generates parasequences via a Ginsburg-type mechanism of sediment transport and shoreline progradation. Parasequence stacking is controlled by a superimposed, longer-term eustatic oscillation and parasequences generated are analyzed using runs analysis and Durbin-Watson autocorrelation. Results from the modeling suggest that autocyclic parasequences generated by shoreline progradation form ordered vertical successions when accommodation changes, driven by a low-amplitude relative sea-level oscillation, suggesting that partly autocyclic strata may not be inherently any less ordered than entirely allocyclic strata. Addition of stochastic processes such as mosaic carbonate production and fluctuations in regional sediment transport direction tend to decrease the level of measurable order present in the autocyclic strata. Increasing the frequency and amplitude of relative sea-level oscillations also tends to decrease the measurable order in stacked autocyclic peritidal parasequence thicknesses. These results suggest that controls on parasequence stacking patterns are likely to be more complex and varied than suggested by recent sequence stratigraphic models; more outcrop and modeling investigation is required, with appropriately circumspect interpretations applied.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
P. M. Burgess
The nature of shallow-water carbonate lithofacies thickness distributions
Geology, March 1, 2008; 36(3): 235 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology.