| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Perspective |
1 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas at Arlington, P.O. Box 19049, Arlington, Texas 76019-0049, U.S.A.; shanshanmugam{at}aol.com
The genetic term tsunamite is used for a potpourri of deposits formed from a wide range of processes (overwash surges, backwash flows, oscillatory flows, combined flows, soft-sediment deformation, slides, slumps, debris flows, and turbidity currents) related to tsunamis in lacustrine, coastal, shallow-marine, and deep-marine environments. Tsunamites exhibit enormous variability of features (e.g., normally graded sand, floating mudstone clasts, hummocky cross stratification, etc.). These sedimentary features may also be interpreted as deposits of turbidity currents (turbidites), debris flows (debrites), or storms (tempestites). However, sedimentary features play a passive role when these same deposits are reinterpreted as tsunamites on the basis of historical evidence for tsunamis and their triggering mechanisms (e.g., earthquakes, volcanic explosions, landslides, and meteorite impacts). This bipartite (sedimentological vs. historical) approach, which allows here classification of the same deposit as both turbidite and tsunamite, has blurred the distinction between shallow-marine and deep-marine facies. A solution to this problem is to classify deposits solely by a descriptive sedimentological approach. The notion that tsunami waves can directly deposit sediment in the deep sea is unrealistic because tsunami waves represent transfer of energy and they are sediment starved. During tsunamis and major storms, submarine canyons serve as the physical link between shallow-water and deep-water environments for sediment transport. Tsunami-related deposition involves four progressive steps: (1) triggering stage (offshore), (2) tsunami stage (incoming waves), (3) transformation stage (near the coast), and (4) depositional stage (outgoing sediment flows). In this progression, deep-water deposition can commence only after the demise of incoming tsunami waves due to their transformation into outgoing sediment flows. Deposits of these sediment flows already have established names (e.g., debrite and turbidite). Therefore, the term tsunamite for these deposits is obsolete.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. Shanmugam, S.K. Shrivastava, and B. Das Sandy Debrites and Tidalites of Pliocene Reservoir Sands in Upper-Slope Canyon Environments, Offshore Krishna-Godavari Basin (India): Implications Journal of Sedimentary Research, September 1, 2009; 79(9): 736 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Shanmugam Comment on "Late Holocene Rupture of the Northern San Andreas Fault and Possible Stress Linkage to the Cascadia Subduction Zone" by Chris Goldfinger, Kelly Grijalva, Roland Burgmann, Ann E. Morey, Joel E. Johnson, C. Hans Nelson, Julia Gutierrez-Pastor, Andrew Ericsson, Eugene Karabanov, Jason D. Chaytor, Jason Patton, and Eulalia Gracia Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2009; 99(4): 2594 - 2598. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Shanmugam The constructive functions of tropical cyclones and tsunamis on deep-water sand deposition during sea level highstand: Implications for petroleum exploration AAPG Bulletin, April 1, 2008; 92(4): 443 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Shanmugam Leaves in turbidite sands: The main source of oil and gas in the deep-water Kutei Basin, Indonesia: Discussion AAPG Bulletin, January 1, 2008; 92(1): 127 - 137. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
