Journal of Sedimentary Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Sedimentary Research; March 2006; v. 76; no. 3; p. 404-410; DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2006.043
© 2006 SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dickson, J.A.D.
Right arrow Articles by Saller, A.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Current Ripple

Carbon Isotope Excursions and Crinoid Dissolution at Exposure Surfaces in Carbonates, West Texas, U.S.A.

J.A.D. Dickson1 and A.H. Saller2

1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EQ, U.K.; jadd1{at}esc.cam.ac.uk
2 Unocal, 14141 Southwest Freeway, Sugar Land, Texas 77478, U.S.A.

Carbonates from the Horseshoe Atoll, Reinecke Field, West Texas, U.S.A., show four subaerial exposure events by the presence of rhizoliths, alveolar septal fabric, and thin calcretes that subdivide the Pennsylvanian succession into five sequences. Vertical profiles of bulk rock {delta}13C analyses show values that are generally ~ +1{per thousand} (PDB), but negative shifts of up to 2{per thousand} occur beneath exposure surfaces. The bulk-rock {delta}13C values ~ +1{per thousand} could be explained as a mixture of 63% marine carbonate ({delta}13C = +4{per thousand}) and 37% pedogenic carbonate ({delta}13C = –4{per thousand}) while a negative bulk-rock excursion of {delta}13C = ~ –1{per thousand} can be explained as a mixture of 37% marine and 63% pedogenic calcite. Distinctive negative shifts in the {delta}13C profiles do not occur under some exposure surfaces that contain soil-generated features, and one negative shift occurs that apparently is unrelated to an exposure surface. Bulk-rock {delta}13C values are difficult to interpret because the volume of their various components is unknown. Furthermore, {delta}13C profiles may miss subaerial exposure surfaces.

Certain styles of crinoid alteration may indicate paleo-subaerial exposure surfaces. Fossil crinoids can be preserved in a variety of ways, but crinoids with dissolution holes that subsequently either become filled with calcite cement or were crushed during burial are restricted to 2 m below exposure surfaces. Dissolution of Mg calcite crinoids is due to their relatively high Mg composition, 12 mole % MgCO3, combined with their location beneath soil-capped surfaces from which meteoric waters greatly undersaturated with respect to calcite emerged. Late-stage dissolution removed finely crystalline calcite, but crinoids by this time had stabilized to coarsely crystalline calcite and dolomite and thus were unaffected. Evaluation of other stratigraphic systems is needed to determine whether the use of "holey" crinoids to identify subaerial exposure surfaces has broad application.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology.