HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (16) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Olariu, C. Articles by Bhattacharya, J. P. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Terminal Distributary Channels and Delta Front Architecture of River-Dominated Delta Systems

¹ Department of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, P.O. Box 830688, Richardson, Texas 75083-0688, U.S.A.; present address: Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station C1100, Austin, Texas 78712-0254, U.S.A.; cornelo{at}mail.utexas.edu
² Department of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, P.O. Box 830688, Richardson, Texas 75083-0688, U.S.A.; present address: Department of Geosciences, University of Houston, 4800 Calhoun Road, Houston, Texas 77204-5007, U.S.A.

Using modern and ancient examples we show that river-dominated deltas formed in shallow basins have multiple coeval terminal distributary channels at different scales. Sediment dispersion through multiple terminal distributary channels results in an overall lobate shape of the river-dominated delta that is opposite to the digitate Mississippi type, but similar with deltas described as wave-dominated. The examples of deltas that we present show typical coarsening-upward delta-front facies successions but do not contain deep distributary channels, as have been routinely interpreted in many ancient deltas. We show that shallow-water river-dominated delta-front deposits are typically capped by small terminal distributary channels, the cross-sectional area of which represents a small fraction of the main fluvial "trunk" channel.

Recognizing terminal distributary channels is critical in interpretation of river-dominated deltas. Terminal distributary channels are the most distal channelized features and can be both subaerial and subaqueous. Their dimensions vary between tens of meters to kilometers in width, with common values of 100–400 m and depths of 1–3 m, and are rarely incised. The orientation of the terminal distributary channels for the same system has a large variation, with values between 123° (Volga Delta) and 248° (Lena Delta). Terminal distributary channels are intimately associated with mouth-bar deposits and are infilled by aggradation and lateral or upstream migration of the mouth bars. Deposits of terminal distributary channels have characteristic sedimentary structures of unidirectional effluent flow but also show evidence of reworking by waves and tides.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. D. Enge and J. A. Howell Impact of deltaic clinothems on reservoir performance: Dynamic studies of reservoir analogs from the Ferron Sandstone Member and Panther Tongue, Utah AAPG Bulletin, February 1, 2010; 94(2): 139 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Straub, C. Paola, D. Mohrig, M. A. Wolinsky, and T. George Compensational Stacking of Channelized Sedimentary Deposits Journal of Sedimentary Research, September 1, 2009; 79(9): 673 - 688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C. Mancuso and C. A. Marsicano Paleoenvironments and taphonomy of a Triassic lacustrine system (Los Rastros Formation, central-western Argentina) Palaios, August 1, 2008; 23(8): 535 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Buatois, N. Santiago, K. Parra, and R. Steel Animal-Substrate Interactions in an Early Miocene Wave-Dominated Tropical Delta: Delineating Environmental Stresses and Depositional Dynamics (Tacata Field, Eastern Venezuela) Journal of Sedimentary Research, July 1, 2008; 78(7): 458 - 479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Howell, A. Skorstad, A. MacDonald, A. Fordham, S. Flint, B. Fjellvoll, and T. Manzocchi Sedimentological parameterization of shallow-marine reservoirs Petroleum Geoscience, February 1, 2008; 14(1): 17 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. P. North and G. L. Warwick Fluvial Fans: Myths, Misconceptions, and the End of the Terminal-Fan Model Journal of Sedimentary Research, September 1, 2007; 77(9): 693 - 701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Gani and J. P. Bhattacharya Basic Building Blocks and Process Variability of a Cretaceous Delta: Internal Facies Architecture Reveals a More Dynamic Interaction of River, Wave, and Tidal Processes Than Is Indicated by External Shape Journal of Sedimentary Research, April 1, 2007; 77(4): 284 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Lee, G. A. McMechan, M. R. Gani, J. P. Bhattacharya, X. Zeng, and C. D. Howell Jr. 3-D Architecture and Sequence Stratigraphic Evolution of a Forced Regressive Top-Truncated Mixed-Influenced Delta, Cretaceous Wall Creek Sandstone, Wyoming, U.S.A. Journal of Sedimentary Research, April 1, 2007; 77(4): 303 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Rygel and M. R. Gibling Natural Geomorphic Variability Recorded in a High-Accommodation Setting: Fluvial Architecture of the Pennsylvanian Joggins Formation of Atlantic Canada Journal of Sedimentary Research, November 1, 2006; 76(11): 1230 - 1251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Gibling Width and Thickness of Fluvial Channel Bodies and Valley Fills in the Geological Record: A Literature Compilation and Classification Journal of Sedimentary Research, May 1, 2006; 76(5): 731 - 770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]