Journal of Sedimentary Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Sedimentary Research; March 2005; v. 75; no. 2; p. 177-189; DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2005.014
© 2005 SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Research Articles: Carbonate Mineralogy

Dolomite Crystal Architecture: Genetic Implications for the Origin of the Tertiary Dolostones of the Cayman Islands

Brian Jones1

1 Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada

Dolostones in the Cayman Formation on Grand Cayman and Cayman Brac, which are the product of two and possibly three phases of dolomitization, are formed of very small (< 100 µm) but architecturally complex dolomite crystals that are characterized by planar and non-planar boundaries, corrosional internal discontinuities, oscillatory low-Ca calcian dolomite (LCD) and high-Ca calcian dolomite (HCD) zoning, and syntaxial (?) overgrowths. The dolomite overgrowths, which grew on earlier formed but corroded rhombs, increased crystal size and modified crystal shape and, hence, caused significant textural modifications. The size and shape of the overgrowths that developed preferentially on those crystal faces that formed the walls of micropores was controlled by the competition for growth space with neighboring crystals. Interpretation of this textural information suggests that the development of planar and non-planar dolomite boundaries crystals is probably related to critical supersaturation levels rather than critical roughening temperatures.

The recognition that individual dolomite crystals, irrespective of their size, may be architecturally heterogeneous carries important implications for dolomite genesis. Many interpretations of finely crystalline dolostones, for example, have tacitly assumed that they formed through one phase of dolomitization. In the Cayman Formation, however, dolomite crystals as small as 10 µm are characterized by internal heterogeneities that record their development through multiple, time-separated growth phases. Any model developed to explain dolomitization must take this into account. The interpretation of chemical data, for example, must consider the multiple-stage development of the dolostones that is evident from their internal zoning and discontinuities.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
B. Jones
Inside-Out Dolomite
Journal of Sedimentary Research, July 1, 2007; 77(7): 539 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology.