Journal of Sedimentary Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Sedimentary Research; January 2005; v. 75; no. 1; p. 55-66; DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2005.006
© 2005 SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fielding, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Research Articles: Deltas and Shorefaces

Sharp-Based, Flood-Dominated Mouth Bar Sands from the Burdekin River Delta of Northeastern Australia: Extending the Spectrum of Mouth-Bar Facies, Geometry, and Stacking Patterns

Christopher R. Fielding1, Jonathon D. Trueman2 and Jan Alexander3

1 Department of Geosciences, 214 Bessey Hall, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0340, U.S.A.; cfielding2{at}unl.edu
2 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Queensland, Qld 4072, Australia; present address: BP Exploration, Farburn Industrial Estate, Dyce, Aberdeen AB21 7PB, United Kingdom
3 School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, U.K.

Distinguishing the deposits of mouth bars from delta distributary channels in the rock record may not be as straightforward as often portrayed, because mouth-bar deposits can be more variable than usually presumed. Mouth bars with triangular plan-view subaerial geometry are well developed at the mouth of the modern Burdekin River of northeastern Australia. This planform is intermediate between the elongate, lozenge-shaped mouth bars typical of river-dominated deltas and the beach-ridge geometries characteristic of wave-dominated deltas. Surface and shallow-subsurface bar deposits are predominantly moderately sorted, coarse-grained sand, similar to that of adjacent, lower-delta-plain-channel floor. Sedimentary textures are modified at seaward sides of mouth bars by waves into a foreshore of well-sorted fine to medium-grained sand, and mouth bar sands pass distally and laterally into more mud-dominated lithologies. The Holocene section beneath the lower delta plain is dominated by 5–8 m thick, sharp-based bodies of coarse-grained sand, texturally indistinguishable from the modern mouth bar with no vertical grain-size trend, a slight upward-fining trend, or in a few cases a coarsening-upward trend. These sand bodies have low-angle seaward-dipping internal bedding surfaces and are bounded by surfaces of similar attitude. The Holocene Burdekin Delta was and is flood-dominated (rather than strongly wave-influenced, as proposed previously) and prograded by rapid deposition of mouth bars during river floods (most of which last for only a few days). Mouth-bar construction takes place over tens of years. The variable vertical grain-size profiles of mouth-bar deposits suggests formation by both aggradation and progradation, and this is supported by the cross-sectional geometry of mouth-bar clinoform sets imaged geophysically. Once a mouth bar has become emergent and is stabilized by vegetation, a new bar is initiated seaward. In this way, delta "lobes" are constructed over 100s to 1000s of years before being abandoned following an avulsion of the trunk river channel to another part of the delta. Caution is needed in the interpretation of ancient shallow-water deltaic successions, where sharp-based, fining-upward mouth bar deposits may be confused with distributary-channel facies.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
S. Yoshida, R. J. Steel, and R. W. Dalrymple
Changes in Depositional Processes--An Ingredient in a New Generation of Sequence-Stratigraphic Models
Journal of Sedimentary Research, June 1, 2007; 77(6): 447 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
K. Lee, G. A. McMechan, M. R. Gani, J. P. Bhattacharya, X. Zeng, and C. D. Howell Jr.
3-D Architecture and Sequence Stratigraphic Evolution of a Forced Regressive Top-Truncated Mixed-Influenced Delta, Cretaceous Wall Creek Sandstone, Wyoming, U.S.A.
Journal of Sedimentary Research, April 1, 2007; 77(4): 303 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
C. R. Fielding, J. D. Trueman, and J. Alexander
Holocene Depositional History of the Burdekin River Delta of Northeastern Australia: A Model for a Low-Accommodation, Highstand Delta
Journal of Sedimentary Research, March 1, 2006; 76(3): 411 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
J. G. Flocks, N. F. Ferina, C. Dreher, J. L. Kindinger, D. M. FitzGerald, and M. A. Kulp
High-Resolution Stratigraphy of a Mississippi Subdelta-Lobe Progradation in the Barataria Bight, North-Central Gulf of Mexico
Journal of Sedimentary Research, March 1, 2006; 76(3): 429 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
J. Alexander and C. R. Fielding
Coarse-Grained Floodplain Deposits in the Seasonal Tropics: Towards a Better Facies Model
Journal of Sedimentary Research, March 1, 2006; 76(3): 539 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology.