Journal of Sedimentary Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Sedimentary Research; January 2005; v. 75; no. 1; p. 114-133; DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2005.010
© 2005 SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, M. E.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Research Articles: Reefs

Development of Equatorial Delta-Front Patch Reefs During the Neogene, Borneo

Moyra E.J. Wilson1

1 Department of Geological Sciences, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 4EL, U.K.; moyra.wilson{at}durham.ac.uk

Miocene patch reefs formed in turbid waters associated with high siliciclastic input at the seaward margin of the equatorial Mahakam Delta in eastern Borneo, SE Asia. Patch reefs were initiated on unstable substrates on localized low-relief bathymetric highs associated with delta-front channels or distributary mouthbars in the process of abandonment. Patch reefs developed only in shallow waters, formed low-relief buildups, lacked rigid frameworks, and had gently sloping margins. Although the biodiversity of the patch reefs may be comparable with that of clear-water systems, all the organisms present were adapted to turbid-water areas associated with siliciclastic, and sometimes nutrient, influx. The patch reefs were transient features, and their demise was influenced by increased siliciclastic and nutrient input, perhaps at times associated with deepening.

Carbonate production and bioherm or patch-reef development can occur in turbid-water delta-front areas as localized or more regionally extensive units during any phases of eustatic sea level. However, development and preservation of turbid-water carbonates is most likely during relative transgression or perhaps late lowstand periods. This is in contrast with common highstand carbonates from clear-water shelves, where nearly pure carbonates interdigitate with siliciclastics. It is the interplay between factors such as tectonics, eustasy, delta lobe switching, shelf currents, and amount and size fraction of siliciclastic influx that ultimately controlled carbonate development and preservation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. J. Alvaro and S. Clausen
Botoman (Lower Cambrian) turbid- and clear-water reefs and associated environments from the High Atlas, Morocco
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 275(1): 51 - 70.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology.